New Perspective for US Supreme Court?
I have always had questions about the way eminent domain laws work. Finally, the people are fighting back! Read this article to see what I mean:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1529693
If I were President, I would make a lot changes. I would certainly look into the alleged misuse of eminent domain. I think that using eminent domain laws to annex the Judge's house is perfectly appropriate.
What's that old saying...
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander.
I for one wasn't happy with that ruling by the US Supreme Court. Going after a US Supreme Court Judge doesn't seem like a great idea to me, but I think if they do annex his house it will send a clear message to the US Supreme Court how the people feel about that decision and it will give Justice Souter a new perspective on the eminent domain laws as well.
I would probably vote in favor of annexing his house, would you?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1529693
If I were President, I would make a lot changes. I would certainly look into the alleged misuse of eminent domain. I think that using eminent domain laws to annex the Judge's house is perfectly appropriate.
What's that old saying...
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander.
I for one wasn't happy with that ruling by the US Supreme Court. Going after a US Supreme Court Judge doesn't seem like a great idea to me, but I think if they do annex his house it will send a clear message to the US Supreme Court how the people feel about that decision and it will give Justice Souter a new perspective on the eminent domain laws as well.
I would probably vote in favor of annexing his house, would you?
posted by gmanty at 8:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home